Re: How to get started hacking on pgsql

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to get started hacking on pgsql
Date: 2003-12-04 21:10:43
Message-ID: 1070572243.3543.9.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing kirjutas N, 04.12.2003 kell 23:01:

>
> > Where should I be looking in the code?
>
> Try to find where the modified query is tested for. It's probably be
> inside the optimizer, as index scan + no sort is not always faster than
> seq scan + sort, as shown by the same query after vacuum analyze (on an
> empty table)

OTOH, it may be that all combinations of sort and index and where are
not watched in the optimiser proper at all (too compliaced and/or too
costly), but a keyhole optimiser is run over its resulting "best" plan
to remove redundant sorts (but it misses combinations of sort and where
like the one in your example)

---------------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2003-12-04 21:20:22 Re: autovacuum daemon stops doing work after about an hour
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-12-04 21:10:41 Re: tuning questions