Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>
Cc: PostgreSQL general list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-11-30 06:02:05
Message-ID: 1070172124.7728.772.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 04:26, Randolf Richardson wrote:
...
> Keep in mind that (at least in Canada) contractual agreements are only
> valid when an aspect called "consideration" exists, which means that both
> parties benefit in some way (which must not be grossly unfair to one side).
>
> With all this mish-mash of various licenses, I wonder how
> "consideration" would fit in to it all.

Consideration is a concept in contract law. It has no relevance to
licences, which are NOT contracts.

The essence of a contract is that each party gives something (the
consideration) to the other. A licence is one-sided. (However, a
licence may itself be the consideration, as when you pay for commercial
software.)

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"But grow in grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord
and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and
for ever. Amen." II Peter 3:18

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2003-11-30 09:45:17 Re: Was: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP
Previous Message Brian Hirt 2003-11-30 05:19:51 Re: patch for pg_autovacuum