From: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Breen Ouellette <the(dot)man(at)breeno(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license |
Date: | 2003-11-29 11:56:01 |
Message-ID: | 1070106961.21501.142.camel@jeff |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
> "Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose, WITHOUT FEE, and without a written
> agreement is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice
> and this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all
> copies."
My personal interpretation isn't very ambiguous at all. If the license
were interpreted to require that you could not charge to provide someone
with a copy of postgres, that would imply that you aren't allowed to
have a written agreement with them either. That just doesn't make sense
to me.
I can see how a lawyer might tell someone to play it safe though. Also,
I suppose in any disagreement over the ambiguity of a text, the side
perceiving ambiguities is bound to win ;)
regards,
jeff davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kent L. Nasveschuk | 2003-11-29 12:32:32 | Re: pg_lo_import alternative ... |
Previous Message | ow | 2003-11-29 10:48:43 | Why both?: /var/log/messages AND /var/log/pgsql. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vernon Smith | 2003-11-29 16:34:01 | failed to lookup type 0 |
Previous Message | Randolf Richardson | 2003-11-29 04:06:54 | Re: [ADMIN] Misplaced modifier in Postgresql license |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Bartlett | 2003-11-29 12:47:36 | Re: Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Paul Thomas | 2003-11-29 11:45:28 | Triggers, Stored Procedures, PHP. was: Re: PostgreSQL Advocacy, Thoughts and Comments |