Jianghua Yang <yjhjstz(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I wanted to ask if this patch can be merged first, as it seems to be a
> separate issue different from the aclitem parsing problem Tom discussed in
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3792884.1751492172%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Merging your patch will make it more difficult to poke at these
underlying issues, so I'm not in a hurry to do that. It's not
like this is an urgent issue: initdb has behaved like that for
years if not decades, and nobody's complained before.
regards, tom lane