Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC

From: Steve Wampler <swampler(at)noao(dot)edu>
To: steffann(at)nederland(dot)ent
Cc: Postgres-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Date: 2003-11-25 20:50:33
Message-ID: 1069793432.1610.4.camel@weaver.tuc.noao.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 12:39, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> Sander Steffann wrote:
...
> > In short: both filesizes are correct, and I can't explain it :(
> > Sander.
>
> However 6MB of difference for postgresql-server-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm
> and 2.2 MB for postgresql-contrib-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm
> are too much !

If you do a 'file' command on the executables does one set show
up stripped while the other doesn't. The sizes of individual
files are consistent with that difference (roughly).

If they are the same, and 'ldd' shows the same set of shared
libraries loaded, then look at the sizes of the non-shared
libraries used on the two OS versions.

--
Steve Wampler -- swampler(at)noao(dot)edu
Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota
monax materiam possit materiari?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-11-25 21:08:08 Re: pam authentication for postgres
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2003-11-25 20:38:17 Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC