Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu
Cc: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the
Date: 2003-11-19 21:00:46
Message-ID: 1069275646.10323.9571.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 10:47, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
>
> Mike> Robert Treat wrote:
>
> >> While some form of bitmapped indexing would be cool, other ideas might
> >> be to implement different buffer manager strategies. I was impressed by
> >> how quickly Jan was able to implement ARC over LRU, but there are a host
> >> of other strategies that could also be implemented.
>
> We already do that !
>

:-)

> We have a first "warm-up" assignment for which they get 2 weeks and
> have to change the strategy to MRU from LRU (in an earlier semester
> they were assigned 2Q). The idea here more to just get used to the
> code and the debugger.
>

It would be cool if some of these were posted to -patches... *in theory*
it would give folks a chance to do real stress testing on different
implementations. if nothing else we could bug Jan some more about making
the buffer management code configurable ;-)

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cornelia Boenigk 2003-11-19 21:37:47 Re: Of Conventions: PHPCon & Comdex
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-19 20:37:29 Ahhhh.... last pg_ctl post

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Spraul 2003-11-19 21:07:57 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code
Previous Message strk 2003-11-19 20:42:15 with(isstrict) vs ISSTRICT