| From: | Reece Hart <reece(at)in-machina(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2 |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 01:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1068687983.5532.10.camel@whoville |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 09:04, jake johnson wrote:
> I also posted about the performance increase of 7.4, but I think that
> much of the difference you're seeing (because it's such a large
> difference) is probably due to the cleanliness of a newly restored
> database from backup.
I agree that this seems likely, except that the 7.3.4 database is
vacuumed nightly, and analyzed periodically. And about a week ago I
reclustered on the index intended to most facilitate this select.
Furthermore, merely hardcoding the subselect result achieves a
tremendous improvement (which was the workaround I used). So, I'm pretty
sure that it's not a vacuum, index use, or cleanliness issue.
I also meant to add in my original post that the system is a dual 2.4G
xeon with 4GB of RAM.
-Reece
--
Reece Hart, http://www.in-machina.com/~reece/, GPG:0x25EC91A0 0xD178AAF9
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Gigger | 2003-11-13 01:51:24 | Re: simple question |
| Previous Message | ljb | 2003-11-13 01:10:40 | Re: PGexec dumps core at pqResultAlloc |