Re: \xDD patch for 7.5devel

From: Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: jasongodden(at)optushome(dot)com(dot)au, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: \xDD patch for 7.5devel
Date: 2003-11-05 19:25:27
Message-ID: 1068060327.5360.0.camel@severn2
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

В Срд, 05.11.2003, в 16:25, Tom Lane пишет:

> > +#define HEXVALUE(c) (((c)>='a') ? ((c)-87) : (((c)>='A') ? ((c)-55) : ((c)-'0')))
>
> This seems excessively dependent on the assumption that the character
> set is ASCII. Why have you hard-coded numeric equivalents into this
> macro?

What not ASCII compatible character sets are out there in use still
today?

--
Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-11-05 19:37:50 Re: Experimental ARC implementation
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-05 19:17:21 Very poor estimates from planner