| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | janandre(at)gen5(dot)co(dot)za |
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ResultSetMetaData implementation addendum |
| Date: | 2003-11-03 15:08:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1067872132.1621.63.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
And a test case for the test suite would be greatly appreciated as well.
Dave
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 03:40, Jan-Andre le Roux wrote:
> Hi
>
> I implemented the getTable() method in AbstractJdbc2ResultSetMetaData
> (only for protocol version 3), however, I had to change the Field class
> (added tableOid field and added a getter for BaseConnection), the
> receiveFieldsV3() method in QueryExecutor to account for the extra
> tableOid field in the Field class.
>
> What is the correct way to create patches?
>
>
>
> thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-11-03 15:24:12 | Re: Driver.acceptsURL(String) not working correctly |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-11-03 14:52:18 | Re: ResultSetMetaData implementation |