Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2019-03 CF Summary / Review - Tranche #2
Date: 2019-02-17 23:30:12
Message-ID: 10670.1550446212@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> - Prove IS NOT NULL inference for large arrays
>>
>> NR: No idea.

> As the fairly new author of this patch, my perspective is that this
> patch got quite a bit of review, albeit without a formal "yes or no"
> response.

FWIW, I ran out of time for that patch during the January 'fest, but
I think it still has a good shot at getting committed during March.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-17 23:38:20 Re: BUG #15572: Misleading message reported by "Drop function operation" on DB with functions having same name
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-02-17 23:21:56 Re: Ryu floating point output patch