Re: 7.4 compatibility question

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Date: 2003-10-22 04:42:44
Message-ID: 1066797764.374.1.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 00:41, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > It would be pretty strange to use those as a default --- I am not
> > inclined to mention it in the release notes --- we don't mention every
> > change, only significant ones.
>
> Personally, I think that's a fairly silly policy!

I agree -- documenting possible areas of incompatibility is important,
and I would prefer that we err on the side of mentioning too much,
rather than too little.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-22 04:50:58 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-22 04:42:41 Re: 7.4 compatibility question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-22 04:50:58 Re: 7.4 compatibility question
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-22 04:42:41 Re: 7.4 compatibility question