Re: 2-phase commit

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-10-09 15:45:33
Message-ID: 1065714332.45504.5.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > If you want cross-server transactions, what other methods are there that
> > are more reliable?
>
> 3-phase commit

How about a real world example of a transaction manager that has
actually implemented 3PC?

But yes, the ability for the participants to talk to each-other in the
event the controller is unavailable seems an obvious fix.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-10-09 16:07:18 Re: 2-phase commit
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-09 15:26:47 Re: 2-phase commit