Re: Compression and on-disk sorting

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Compression and on-disk sorting
Date: 2006-05-15 18:18:03
Message-ID: 10654.1147717083@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> A recent post Tom made in -bugs about how bad performance would be if we
> spilled after-commit triggers to disk got me thinking... There are
> several operations the database performs that potentially spill to disk.
> Given that any time that happens we end up caring much less about CPU
> usage and much more about disk IO, for any of these cases that use
> non-random access, compressing the data before sending it to disk would
> potentially be a sizeable win.

Note however that what the code thinks is a spill to disk and what
actually involves disk I/O are two different things. If you think
of it as a spill to kernel disk cache then the attraction is a lot
weaker...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-15 18:23:09 Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2006-05-15 18:11:28 Re: [TODO] Allow commenting of variables ...