From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | PITR (was Re: Type of application that use PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2003-10-03 19:02:42 |
Message-ID: | 1065207762.1513.121.camel@haggis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 09:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in> writes:
> > Peter Childs wrote:
[snip]
> All that we basically need for PITR is to provide management code that
> lets old WAL segments get archived off to tape (or wherever) rather than
> deleted, plus some kind of control that lets the roll-forward process be
> stopped at the desired point-in-time rather than necessarily running to
> the end of the available WAL data. This isn't a trivial amount of code,
> but there's no great conceptual difficulty either.
Hope everybody realizes that the amount of WALs will get very big
on active-update systems...
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA
Great Inventors of our time:
Al Gore -> Internet
Sun Microsystems -> Clusters
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-10-03 19:04:52 | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-10-03 18:58:59 | online vs. hot backup (was Re: Type of application that use PostgreSQL) |