Re: Server recommendations

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net>
Cc: PgSQL General ML <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Server recommendations
Date: 2003-10-03 17:14:13
Message-ID: 1065201253.1513.93.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 11:49, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> Actually,
> I don't need something so big as that, and the people who are going
> to be using this don't have the kind of IT dept that can maintain it. It
> needs to be a standard PC based architecture, just server grade.
>
> Opteron - PC compatible, by Intel?

http://www.upgradingandrepairingpcs.com/articles/2003/upgrade07_03_08.asp
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_739_9003,00.html
http://www.laclinux.com/en/opt

The Opteron can act like a 32 bit x86 system (and run 32 bit
binaries *directly* in the h/w w/o slowdown for translation), or
it can run in 64 bit mode and go even faster because of extra
registers. There's also a mixed mode, where 32-bit x86 apps
can run on a system running a 64-bit AMD64 (generic name for
Opteron and Athlon64) kernel.

> Opteron - Costs vs Xeon or Pentium?

More expensive than P4, less than Xeon.

The Athlon64 is the consumer-grade version of the Opteron, and
is cheaper than the P4.

> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 10:37, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Christopher Browne wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Oops! gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net (Dennis Gearon) was seen spray-painting on a wall:
> >>>
> >>>
> >[snip]
> >
> >
> >> From what I read on postgresql lists, it seems that opteron based machines are
> >>doing quite a good job as database server with right kind of disk. You could
> >>look at any such machine for database server..
> >>
> >>Check this..
> >>
> >>http://www.polywell.com/us/rackservers/poly1u2c.asp
> >>http://www.opteronics.com/opteron-servers.htm
> >>
> >>IMO they could be better machine for databases. Get a 64 bit linux kernel and
> >>run 32 bit postgresql on it. Should work like a charm..
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Why not run 64-bit PG on the 64-bit kernel? A bunch of distros
> >are releasing support for the AMD64 this month.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net
Jefferson, LA USA

"What's your genius, perfect 20 years too late Monday morning
quarterback answer to how the US should have responded to the
Soviet invasion of Afghanistan? Oh wait, you're just talking
crap - you don't have a real answer, you're just regurgitating
crap from NPR."
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=76597&cid=6839483

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel J. Andrews 2003-10-03 17:52:08 Re: Tsearch2 Causing Backend Crash
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-03 17:01:05 Re: updating records