[Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] PL contribution guidelines?]

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [Fwd: Re: [HACKERS] PL contribution guidelines?]
Date: 2003-09-29 19:31:18
Message-ID: 1064863878.2600.502.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Did we kill the guides / zope?

Robert Treat

-----Forwarded Message-----

> From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PL contribution guidelines?
> Date: 28 Sep 2003 15:34:05 +0530
>
> On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:53, mlg7 wrote:
> > >On Saturday 27 September 2003 19:46, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >> mlg7 writes:
> > >> > Is there a centralized list of pgsql PL's ?
> > >>
> > >> I'm not aware of one.
> > >
> > >http://techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/PLLanguages
> > >
> > >Josh posted it on advocacy few days back.
> > >
> > > Shridhar
> >
> > That does not work:
> > : Proxy Error
> > : The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
> > :
> > : The proxy server could not handle the request GET /guides/PLLanguages.
> > :
> > : Reason: Could not connect to remote machine: Operation timed out
>
> Try google cache
>
> http://www.google.co.in/search?q=cache:iDjd8nA-l2IJ:techdocs.postgresql.org/guides/PLLanguages+list+of+postgresql+procedural+languages&hl=mr&ie=UTF-8
>
> The google search term I used was "list of postgresql procedural languages".
> Look for first techdocs link.
>
> Yesterday when I got same error, I thought there was problem with
> international link again...:-) Hard to tell where exactly problem is..
>
> Shridhar
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org

--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Grabmller 2003-09-29 19:37:27 Re: Status update
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-09-29 19:28:27 Re: Status update