| From: | Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Time problem again? |
| Date: | 2003-09-29 19:19:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1064863182.28498.31.camel@pennywise.havleik.no |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Well I know the order I want!
The order should be like this during night time:
2230
2350
0100
0350
and
1030
1145
1230
1315
on day time...
But that was my initial question, "As far as I can tell, there is no way
to solve this without also supplying a date or am I missing something?"
BTJ
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 15:22, Richard Huxton wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 12:47, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > Well, I don't.. But normal timespan is about 6-7 hours +- (so one can
> > assume max timespan = 12 hours really...)
>
> Well, if you don't know what order you want, how can you tell PG to show them
> in that order?
>
> I think you might want to log a full timestamp by the sound of it. I'm not
> sure your information is well defined.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-29 19:19:55 | Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance |
| Previous Message | Rasmus Aveskogh | 2003-09-29 18:23:40 | Re: Result set granularity.. |