Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: John Wells <jb(at)sourceillustrated(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres vs. Progress performance
Date: 2003-09-29 18:19:47
Message-ID: 1064859587.2406.491.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 12:43, John Wells wrote:
> We
> average 2.5 million transactions per day or 800 per second.

800*60*60*24 = 69 million per day... are you doing 2.5 million with
burst of up to 800 per second?

we average around 190 tps, though the high burst i see in the last few
seconds is only 270... about 1/3 of those are inserts and/or updates.

the box its running on is a dual pentium 1.3ghz with 1GB of RAM. it's
not optimal hardware either (only 2 disks for starters), but it runs
pretty solidly and the server its on doesn't seem too taxed..

i feel pretty confident that postgresql can handle your workload without
much trouble, you just need to give it enough hardware.

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2003-09-29 18:20:36 Re: ADD FOREIGN KEY (was Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta)
Previous Message James Moe 2003-09-29 18:10:05 Re: numeric rounding