Re: sun solaris & postgres

From: Cindy <ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sun solaris & postgres
Date: 2002-05-20 21:09:34
Message-ID: 10648.1021928974@stephanus.tlg.uci.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


No, if you read more carefully, att is the one that is performing its
operations an order of magnitude faster than steph, which is why we're
so stumped. But I think I located the problem (see other email).

Darren Ferguson writes:
>That could be why 7.1.3 is out performing it has 8 times more memory than
>the 7.2.1 machine
>
>What about CPU's, controllers and are both config files the same for steph
>and att?
>
>Darren Ferguson
>
>On Mon, 20 May 2002, Cindy wrote:
>
>>
>> mpls(at)ipv6(dot)dns2go(dot)com writes:
>> >
>> >Difference specification ??
>> >How many memory in att and steph?
>>
>> steph has
>> Memory size: 4096 Megabytes
>> att has
>> Memory size: 512 Megabytes
>>
>> --Cindy
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
Cindy
ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message sheetal 2002-05-20 21:44:06 Help..
Previous Message Cindy 2002-05-20 21:05:52 Re: sun solaris & postgres