Re: SUM() & GROUP BY

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Muhyiddin A(dot)M Hayat" <middink(at)indo(dot)net(dot)id>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SUM() & GROUP BY
Date: 2003-09-28 19:56:56
Message-ID: 1064779015.1458.4.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:01, Muhyiddin A.M Hayat wrote:
>
> hotel=# SELECT
> hotel-# "public".billing.id,
> hotel-# "public".billing.guest_id,
> hotel-# "public".billing.trx_date,
> hotel-# "public".billing.trx_time,
> hotel-# "public".billing.payment_method,
> hotel-# "public".billing.tax,
> hotel-# "public".billing.dep_id,
> hotel-# "public".department."name",
> hotel-# SUM("public".items.price) AS total,
> hotel-# "public".billing.amount_paid
> hotel-# FROM
> hotel-# "public".billing_items
> hotel-# INNER JOIN "public".billing ON
> ("public".billing_items.billing_id = "public".billing.id)
> hotel-# INNER JOIN "public".department ON ("public".billing.dep_id =
> "public".department.id)
> hotel-# INNER JOIN "public".items ON
> ("public".billing_items.items_id = "public".items.id)
> hotel-# GROUP BY "public".billing.id;
> ERROR: Attribute billing.guest_id must be GROUPed or used in an
> aggregate function
> hotel=#
>
> What Worng ??

Any items in the select list need to be aggregated (e.g.
SUM("public".items.price)) or mentioned in the GROUP BY list. Suppose
there are several billing.guest_id values for each billing.id; which
value should be listed in the output?

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"Blessed is the man that endureth temptation; for when
he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which
the Lord hath promised to them that love him."
James 1:12

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Langille 2003-09-28 20:06:20 Re:
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-28 19:45:22 Re: