Re: pg_id and pg_encoding

From: Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_id and pg_encoding
Date: 2003-09-07 21:56:11
Message-ID: 1062971771.1017.596.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 16:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> > Is there any reason to keep separate pg_id and pg_encoding programs, or
> > should they be merged into a C version of initdb? AFAICS initdb is the
> > only thing that uses them.
>
> Yes, I assume they would go away with a C version.

I use both of them for the Debian packaging, to try to ensure that
upgrading goes seamlessly.

--
Oliver Elphick Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk
Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================
"For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord
shall be saved." Romans 10:13

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-07 22:26:00 Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-09-07 21:34:45 Re: Unixware 713 probs