Re: sequences and pg_type

From: pw <p(dot)willis(at)telus(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sequences and pg_type
Date: 2003-09-07 03:38:37
Message-ID: 1062905917.16961.94.camel@downstairs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I think I found a solution. Hopefully the system tables don't change
too much in the future.I just used pg_attrdef to tell me which columns
*not* to use.

I hope that's right. It seems to work.

Peter

On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 18:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> pw <p(dot)willis(at)telus(dot)net> writes:
> > I have a table with a serial type in it as a record id.
> > The type of this object comes back as int4 when I query via
> > pg_type.
> > How can I distinguish this counter type from just a plain int4?
>
> Well, you can't, because serial isn't actually a type in Postgres.
> As the manual tries to explain, serial is just a shorthand for
creating
> an integer column whose default is a nextval() call on a sequence.
> So the way to tell is to look for a default expression of that kind.
>
> regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-09-07 06:19:31 Re: [PATCHES] Warning for missing createlang
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-07 01:19:27 Re: sequences and pg_type