Re: [HACKERS] Using oids

From: Ashley Cambrell <ash(at)freaky-namuh(dot)com>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Bo Lorentsen <bl(at)netgroup(dot)dk>, "\"Shridhar Daithankar\"" <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Using oids
Date: 2003-09-04 00:28:01
Message-ID: 1062635281.24898.7.camel@zephyrus
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


> That said, there is no reason why someone couldn't create a last_sequence()
> function so you could say SELECT currval( last_sequence() ). Ofcourse, if
> your table has no SERIAL field, you're stuffed either way.

Instead of SELECT currval( last_sequence() ), what about implementing
oracl type binding?

Ala
http://groups.google.com.au/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&th=5cc63a569577d024#link2

With the new FE/BE changes, how easy would it be to implement? (I
mentioned it the FE/BE discussions)

Ashley Cambrell

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-04 00:30:12 Re: What is the good equivalent for ENUM ?
Previous Message darren 2003-09-04 00:24:54 Re: TCL trigger doesn't work after deleting a column

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-04 01:09:35 Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-04 00:09:14 Re: Selecting random rows efficiently