Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <ad-ags(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1
Date: 2007-09-27 16:40:30
Message-ID: 10619.1190911230@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <ad-ags(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> * Decide whether we need to change CSVLOG output to emit virtual XIDs
>> instead of, or perhaps in addition to, regular XIDs. I'm of the opinion
>> that this has to happen, but there didn't seem much enthusiasm for it
>> elsewhere.

> Given we have both in log_line_prefix I'm inclined to say we should do both.

Works for me. Do you want to fix it or shall I?

> On other matters, I think it has been sufficiently established that the
> regression issues with ECPG/MSVC have nothing to do with the build or
> vcregress scripts, so I am going to go ahead and commit my changes for
> those ahead of beta.

IIUC, that won't break buildfarm results because the MSVC critters are
skipping the ecpg tests at present anyway, right? If so, +1. We can
work out how to fix the ecpg results during beta.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-27 16:44:25 Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-09-27 16:39:12 Re: Getting to 8.3 beta1