Re: Qualified tables in error messages

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Qualified tables in error messages
Date: 2003-08-19 02:07:45
Message-ID: 1061258864.33964.9.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> since it's not clear here if the dot is in the name or not. We'd have
> to write
>
> ERROR: table "schema"."foo" does not exist
>
> which is just plain ugly.

Yes, it certainly is.

> There are error fields defined in the SQL spec for table name, schema
> name, etc, and at some point we should consider expanding the

I see, this would be ideal.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-08-19 03:00:19 Re: backwards-compat problem?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-08-19 01:54:06 backwards-compat problem?