| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Release notes for upgrading |
| Date: | 2004-08-11 05:11:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1061.1092201119@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> On Tuesday 10 August 2004 22:57, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> I don't think many users realise they can use the next version's pg_dump
>> to upgrade. I think it should be put in every release notes!
> Assuming we're not ready to recommend Slony for upgrades, I would second this
> idea based on my experience of several cases where I *had* to dump a database
> using the newer pg_dump to get it to upgrade reliably.
This has been standard lore for awhile. Where should we document it
exactly?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-11 06:30:11 | Re: Missing French backend translations in the HEAD |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-11 05:07:46 | Re: Missing French backend translations in the HEAD |