Re: select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data
Date: 2004-02-25 03:35:04
Message-ID: 106.1077680104@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> anyarray has been defined this way since 7.3 -- any concerns there?

I don't think so --- we weren't trying to use it as an actual column
datatype back then.

7.4 has a problem though :-( ... this is one of the "damn I wish we'd
caught that before release" ones, since it can't easily be fixed without
initdb. Reminds me that I need to get to work on making pg_upgrade
viable again.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-02-25 04:07:20 Re: [HACKERS] select statement against pg_stats returns
Previous Message Jeff Holle 2004-02-25 02:36:49 Re: System tuning

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-25 04:07:15 Re: bgwriter never dies
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2004-02-25 00:50:23 Re: Is indexing broken for bigint columns?