Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Date: 2003-07-22 16:43:55
Message-ID: 1058892235.22265.229.camel@camel
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 12:22, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > Mentioning support for AMD's Opteron would also be a good bit to have
> > > since that says, "we're a safe database to base your business around
> > > because we move with the times and support cutting edge hardware, even
> > > though the project has been around forever."
> >
> > still thinking on this one... it's not new that we support 64bit
> > hardware.
>
> No, it's not. I point out, though, that MySQL got a significant amount of
> press milage out of their support for AIX last year ... even though we've had
> it for 2 years. Since we *do* have production-tested support for Opteron in
> this release, we need to trumpet it loud and "grab the high ground."
>

Well, that actually was news, since mysql didn't actually support aix
when they made that announcement. they also get mileage from trumpeting
subselects and transactions, should we toss that in as well?

Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-22 16:45:48 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2003-07-22 16:29:18 Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3