| From: | Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Barry Lind <blind(at)xythos(dot)com> | 
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. | 
| Date: | 2003-07-22 10:37:20 | 
| Message-ID: | 1058870240.11211.57.camel@localhost.localdomain | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc | 
Fernando,
Previously the argument for support of jdk1.1 has been applets. I doubt
that this is true anymore.
Dave
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 11:50, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> We can't even get hold of a 1.1 JDK anymore.  And it is preventing us from using 
> the most basic stuff in the jdbc1 classes because they were introduced in 1.2.
> 
> I am proposing we drop support for Java SDK 1.1 and JDBC1 altogether and keep 
> only JDBC2 (for SDK 1.2 and SDK 1.3) and JDBC3 (for SDK 1.4).
> 
> Concerns?
> 
> 
> P.S.: I even think support for 1.2 is not necessary.  Does anyone know of a 
> place where Java 1.2 is still being used?  They must have a Java that old and 
> still have a reasonably recent backend as the driver only support the last two 
> previous versions (will be 7.2+ in the 7.4 release).
-- 
Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Felipe Schnack | 2003-07-22 12:00:45 | Re: the IN clause saga | 
| Previous Message | Sylwester Rutkowski | 2003-07-22 09:25:33 | inet type handling |