| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_plan_advice |
| Date: | 2026-03-18 20:44:34 |
| Message-ID: | 1057602.1773866674@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Don't know if you noticed yet, but avocet has shown [1] that one
pg_plan_advice test case is unstable under debug_discard_caches = 1:
diff -U3 /home/buildfarm/avocet/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/contrib/pg_plan_advice/expected/prepared.out /home/buildfarm/avocet/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/contrib/pg_plan_advice/results/prepared.out
--- /home/buildfarm/avocet/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/contrib/pg_plan_advice/expected/prepared.out 2026-03-16 11:04:23.453026641 +0100
+++ /home/buildfarm/avocet/buildroot/HEAD/pgsql.build/contrib/pg_plan_advice/results/prepared.out 2026-03-17 20:42:16.262657929 +0100
@@ -57,11 +57,13 @@
-- Prepared, but always_store_advice_details = true, so should show feedback.
PREPARE pt4 AS SELECT * FROM ptab;
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF, PLAN_ADVICE) EXECUTE pt2;
- QUERY PLAN
-------------------------
+ QUERY PLAN
+--------------------------------
Seq Scan on ptab
+ Supplied Plan Advice:
+ SEQ_SCAN(ptab) /* matched */
Generated Plan Advice:
SEQ_SCAN(ptab)
NO_GATHER(ptab)
-(4 rows)
+(6 rows)
I can reproduce this pretty trivially by adding
SET debug_discard_caches = 1;
at the top of contrib/pg_plan_advice/sql/prepared.sql.
It looks like the appearance of "Supplied Plan Advice:" depends
on whether the prepared query's plan got regenerated or not.
I'm not sure if this represents a bug (ie undesirable behavior) or
it's just that the test is being insufficiently careful about
being reproducible.
regards, tom lane
[1] https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=avocet&dt=2026-03-16%2010%3A03%3A01
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-03-18 20:49:37 | Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage |
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-03-18 20:20:20 | Re: table AM option passing |