Re: check constraint

From: erwan ancel <erwan(dot)ancel(at)free(dot)fr>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: check constraint
Date: 2003-06-09 07:42:10
Message-ID: 1055144529.3253.3.camel@brisedorient
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Well, I don't think so: the problem concerns one record of A and one
record of C. This means that they would be 2 different records of the
table which both A and C inherit. The problem stays.

Le dim 08/06/2003 à 21:02, Patrick Welche a écrit :
> > >>On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:52:00 +0200,
> > >> erwan ancel <erwan(dot)ancel(at)free(dot)fr> wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>> I would like to know if it is possible to set "complex" constraints on
> > >>> databases such as:
> > >>>
> > >>> A->B means that in table A, each record references a record of table B
> > >>> (or NULL)
> > >>>
> > >>> so we have:
> > >>>
> > >>> A->B
> > >>> C->B
> > >>> D->C
> > >>> D->A
> > >>> constraint: for one record of D, D->A->B = D->C->B
>
> Could inheritance be used?
>
> D -> A -> B
> D -> C -> B
>
> suggests that A and C are similar. I have never tried using inheritance -
> could you put the constraints on a table which both A and C inherit?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Patrick
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2003-06-09 07:52:51 Re: Speed/Performance with pg_restore
Previous Message Sean Chittenden 2003-06-09 07:01:48 Re: Temporary tables inside functions problem