Volkan YAZICI <yazicivo(at)ttnet(dot)net(dot)tr> writes:
> I noticed a small typo in the patch.
> prev = palloc((m + n) * sizeof(char));
> line should look like
> prev = palloc(2 * m * sizeof(char));
> instead.
If that's wrong, aren't the comments and the length restriction limit
also wrong?
regards, tom lane