Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results
Date: 2017-09-12 19:41:40
Message-ID: 10523.1505245300@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

So the conclusion at the end of the last commitfest was that this patch
should be marked Returned With Feedback, and no new work appears to have
been done on it since then. Why is it in this fest at all? There
certainly doesn't seem to be any reason to review it again.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-09-12 19:51:46 Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the same transaction
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-09-12 19:37:36 Re: Re: DROP SUBSCRIPTION hangs if sub is disabled in the same transaction