Re: Patches (current CVS) for changes if index AM tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patches (current CVS) for changes if index AM tables
Date: 2001-08-16 17:47:05
Message-ID: 10516.997984025@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> thanks, please know we prepared a patch for contrib/btree_gist. It fixes
> memory leak and improve performance. Should I sent it right now or
> wait until you apply previous patches.

I haven't touched that contrib code yet at all. Why don't you just
re-wrap that tarball with the updates and resubmit it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kovacs Zoltan 2001-08-16 17:47:26 PLPGSQL bug in implicit SELECT
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2001-08-16 17:36:56 Re: Patches (current CVS) for changes if index AM tables