Re: OIDs as keys

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: daniel alvarez <d-alvarez(at)gmx(dot)de>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au, dev(at)archonet(dot)com, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OIDs as keys
Date: 2003-03-08 20:09:15
Message-ID: 10510.1047154155@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

daniel alvarez <d-alvarez(at)gmx(dot)de> writes:
>> Not ugly, but a little noisy. However, my idea of having a single SET
>> at the top is never going to work, so I don't have a better idea.

> Why isn't this done on a per-session basis?

Because pg_dump can't know what the session default will be when the
dump is reloaded. The scheme you are proposing will only succeed in
making pg_dump unreliable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message daniel alvarez 2003-03-08 20:16:32 Re: OIDs as keys
Previous Message daniel alvarez 2003-03-08 20:01:32 Re: OIDs as keys