| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread |
| Date: | 2026-06-18 21:05:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1050A00D-0076-4E8B-9179-1AEB69863F84@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 18 Jun 2026, at 22:01, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> For me, the most important reason is OpenSSL, because upstream has
> already reached 4.0 and we still can't drop code written for 1.1.1.
The entire OpenSSL 3.x line will be down to just 3.5 LTS by the time we ship
v20.
One complicating factor when it comes to OpenSSL is that we need the 1.1.1 API
support in order to keep LibreSSL supported. I have a patch almost done for
separating the two such that we can move them independently of each other, but
summer vacation and other $life stuff delayed it. I'll try to get it posted
shortly so that we can start the discussion around that.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-06-18 21:22:25 | Re: PG20 Minimum Dependency Thread |
| Previous Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-06-18 21:01:47 | Re: proposal - queryid can be used as filter for auto_explain |