| From: | philo vivero <phiviv(at)hacklab(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Loki <loki(at)fatelabs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL + IDS load/latency help |
| Date: | 2003-03-27 20:05:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1048795508.2046.218.camel@timetop |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
> We have a PostgreSQL database full of over 500,000 events.
> When the database has a small number of events, to
> retrieve a specific event stored in that db takes a mere
> few seconds.
>
> However, as the database grew in size to where it is now,
> it takes over 15-20 seconds to get information back from a
> query to that database. We have tried everything,
> including vacuum, which someone else recommended to me.
Sometimes it's the simple things. Did you do an explain on the query to
see its access plan? I see nothing in your post about indexes.
> Am I correct in saying that 500,000 events shouldn't be a
> problem? Is there anyone out there with more than 500,000
> events in their DB than what we currently have?
With proper indexes, 500,000,000 "events" shouldn't be a problem.
--
pv
If this helped you, http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=philovivero
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2003-03-27 20:07:23 | Re: Database not restarting |
| Previous Message | Hacksaw | 2003-03-27 19:31:28 | Re: Upgrading: So now you tell me!!?!? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-03-27 20:05:09 | Re: Data conversion in query |
| Previous Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-03-27 19:56:14 | Re: Data conversion in query |