Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

From: Bruce Badger <bruce_badger(at)badgerse(dot)com>
To: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date: 2003-03-10 22:42:56
Message-ID: 1047336177.10725.15.camel@alice
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:18, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > If the backend can not handle the version I request, but can handle a
> > prior version, I'd like to know. I am planning on having handlers for
> > multiple protocol versions in the same memory space (I'm using
> > Smalltalk, BTW) so that one application can talk to various databases
> of
> > various vintages.
> >
> how about a system table, say pg_features which can be queried by the fe
> interface? This could be a table of bools with named features and/or
> other little widgets for compatibility. No protocol modification
> required, unless the scope of the protocol change is such that you can't
> execute a connection and a query.

But wouldn't you have to connect to get this information? Surely this
is a catch 22.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-10 23:30:44 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-10 22:35:04 Re: [GENERAL] division by zero

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-10 23:30:44 Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2003-03-10 22:18:00 Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign