| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new format for describe (repost #2) |
| Date: | 2003-03-06 23:36:44 |
| Message-ID: | 1046993804.487.89.camel@jester |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 18:07, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne writes:
>
> > I mean, what's easier to read at a glance:
> >
> > "$1" FOREIGN KEY (referrer) REFERENCES users_users(userid) ON DELETE SET
> > NULL
> >
> > or
> >
> > > Foreign Keys
> > > Name | Referencing Col | Referenced Tbl | Referenced Col | Delete Action
> > > ------+-----------------+----------------+----------------+---------------
> > ...
> > > $1 | referrer | users_users | userid | SET NULL
>
> The second.
Really? The name is easier to pick out, but other than that....
I guess it's what you're used to looking at.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | 박성호 | 2003-03-07 02:25:54 | MD5 test vector |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-06 23:33:30 | Re: XML ouput for psql |