| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
| Date: | 2022-02-02 02:11:24 |
| Message-ID: | 1046818.1643767884@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It looks like it's processing statements fairly consistently slowly
> through the whole period. Each non-trivial statement takes a bit
> under ~10ms, so it would make sense if by the time we've processed
> ~2.5k lines we've clocked up 30 seconds and a VACUUM replay whacks us.
This test is set up to time out after 30 seconds? We've long had
an unofficial baseline that no timeouts under 180 seconds should
be used in the buildfarm.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-02-02 02:16:19 | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-02-02 01:35:02 | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |