| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Joe Tomcat <tomcat(at)mobile(dot)mp>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.4? |
| Date: | 2003-02-26 06:35:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1046241303.430.52.camel@tokyo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2003-02-25 at 22:44, Ed L. wrote:
> And do I understand correctly the replication to be eventually
> included will be an embedded syncronous replication solution based on
> Postgres-R and the Spread GCS?
No, I don't think that's set in stone (although I can't speak for the
core team). While I think Postgres-R is promising, there might be room
for additional replication implementations that cater to different sets
of requirements.
IMHO, eventually providing solutions for both synchronous and
asynchronous replication would be a good idea.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-02-26 06:40:25 | Re: WITHOUT OIDS |
| Previous Message | Lanble | 2003-02-26 05:43:15 | Key binding in PostGreSQL |