Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Date: 2003-02-20 09:43:18
Message-ID: 1045734198.1397.1.camel@fuji.krosing.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane kirjutas K, 19.02.2003 kell 21:12:
> Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> writes:
> > Ok, if a patch were submitted to the parser to allow the syntax in
> > question would it be considered?
>
> I would vote against it ... but that's only one vote.

Are you against it just on grounds of cleanliness and ANSI compliance,
or do you see more serious problems in letting it in ?

-------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2003-02-20 09:56:39 Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2003-02-20 08:20:08 Re: request for sql3 compliance for the update command