Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27
Date: 2011-01-25 17:57:09
Message-ID: 1044D52D-7A0D-45A7-B846-645E728CF53B@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 25, 2011, at 7:27 AM, David Fetter wrote:

>> Other than adminpack, I think it makes sense to say that extensions
>> are not going into pg_catalog…
>
> Given this, we should maybe see about either making adminpack part of
> PostgreSQL's core distribution (probably a good idea) or moving it out
> of pg_catalog so we don't have an exception to the rule.

+1

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Tolley 2011-01-25 17:59:09 Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-25 17:30:58 Re: a regression