Re: PGP signing releases

From: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases
Date: 2003-02-03 18:24:14
Message-ID: 1044296653.2788.55.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 20:23, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> right, that is why we started to provide md5 checksums ...

md5 checksums only validate that the intended package (trojaned or
legit) has been properly received. They offer nothing from a security
perspective unless the checksums have been signed with a key which can
be readily validated from multiple independent sources.

Regards,

--
Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
Copeland Computer Consulting

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-02-03 18:34:20 Re: Win32 Powerfail testing - results
Previous Message Katie Ward 2003-02-03 17:54:10 Re: Win32 Technical Questions