Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it to

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it to
Date: 2003-02-03 00:31:45
Message-ID: 1044232304.65351.89.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> While we're talking about modifications to idocs, why not have a rating
> system for the usefulness of a comment.

Comment ratings could be useful if the rating is tied to a doc version.
A very useful 7.1 comment may be a little antiquated for 7.3. This
would solve almost all of the issues if comments are ordered by rating.

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-02-03 00:34:21 Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report
Previous Message Kevin Brown 2003-02-03 00:28:34 Re: [PERFORM] not using index for select min(...)