Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Ron Mayer <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-01-31 11:42:58
Message-ID: 1044013378.7957.2.camel@huli
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 15:56, Tom Lane wrote:
> The reason the TIP is
> still there is that there are platforms on which that stuff doesn't work
> very nicely. It's better to let the postmaster exit cleanly so that
> that state gets cleaned up. I have no idea what the comparable issues
> are for a native Windows port, but I bet there are some...

That's why I proposed an automated test for this too. It is mostly
important when conquering new OS'es, but could also be nice to have when
testing if changes to storage manager or some other important subsystem
will break anything.

> regards, tom lane
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antti Haapala 2003-01-31 12:33:39 Re: On file locking
Previous Message Uroš Gruber 2003-01-31 11:11:24 Re: [OpenFTS-general] relor and relkov