| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpython fails its regression test |
| Date: | 2003-01-30 22:53:10 |
| Message-ID: | 1043967190.8699.30.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> In CVS tip, if you run "make installcheck" in src/pl/plpython, the test
> fails with a number of diffs between the expected and actual output.
> I'm not sure if plpython is broken, or if it's just that someone changed
> the behavior and didn't bother to update the test's expected files (the
> test files don't seem to have been maintained since they were first
> installed).
>
> Comments?
>
>
Could this have anything to do with the changes I made to the python
stuff to get it to support longs (IIRC)? It's been a while now so I
don't recall exactly what got changed. I do remember that I chanced
some test code to ensure it tested the newly fixed data type.
Regards,
--
Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
Copeland Computer Consulting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2003-01-30 22:54:19 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Previous Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-01-30 22:47:13 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |