| From: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rocco Altier <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>, Nigel Kukard <nkukard(at)lbsd(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: IPv6 patch |
| Date: | 2003-01-28 02:06:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1043719571.8713.35.camel@tokyo |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 20:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I had someone on the IPv6 IRC channel interested, but haven't seen any
> patch yet. It isn't that hard to do.
If we cleanly split the Postgres-specific code from the stuff that's
been imported from BIND, shouldn't it be easy to import new versions,
and thus get IPv6 support for free?
Or at least, that's what I vaguely recall Paul Vixie saying on
pgsql-patches a while ago:
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-28 02:07:34 | Re: IPv6 patch |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-01-28 01:19:35 | Re: IPv6 patch |