Re: [PATCH] intXshr, intXshl: return error on shift count out of range

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Egor Ivkov <e(dot)ivkov(at)arenadata(dot)io>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ilya Khaprov <i(dot)khaprov(at)arenadata(dot)io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intXshr, intXshl: return error on shift count out of range
Date: 2026-10-01 00:33:35
Message-ID: 1042161.1790814815@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 at 11:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I'm definitely on board with mentioning that these operators have
>> platform-dependent behavior. I doubt we should try to enumerate
>> any details.

> Here's an attempt at that.

Perhaps s/in terms of/in cases of/, or similar wording.
Otherwise I'm okay with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2026-10-01 00:34:57 Re: Document that jsonpath == can be used as ANY
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-10-01 00:16:04 Re: pg_walinspect: add functions to locate and list WAL by time and LSN