Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

From: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: mlw <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Date: 2003-01-07 23:02:17
Message-ID: 1041980536.29933.2.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 16:46, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, mlw wrote:
>
> > This is a serious inquiry, very serious. People are complaining about ads.
> >
> > What do we need in the form of equipment, bandwidth, etc.
>
> FTP is just over 800MB, plan for growth.
> WEB is just over 90MB, can't tell you what to plan for there.
>
> On www/ftp.us I don't even notice the bandwidth, it's less than the normal
> traffic for Pop4 (an ISP) and the streaming audio uses up even more than
> that.
>
> Vince.

I guess I don't understand the problem. The ads are very small and
completely innocuous. Why would anyone care? Who's complaining and
why?

--
Greg Copeland <greg(at)copelandconsulting(dot)net>
Copeland Computer Consulting

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2003-01-07 23:05:06 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-07 22:46:49 Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?